authn: accept tokens.sr.ht working tokens beside the agent token A second agent credential plane, next to the existing one rather than in place of it. The agent_token table, every agent configured with it, and the refs rule and provenance requirement around it are untouched; the local plane is removed in a later phase, not this one. The resolver tries the instance plane first and falls back to the local store on exactly two refusals, bearer.ErrInvalid and bearer.ErrNotOurs. spec's local token has no prefix to discriminate on — it is 32 random bytes in base64, which is precisely what "did not decode as one of ours" looks like — so the fallback replaces the shape test bench and cover can afford. ErrRevoked, ErrForbidden and ErrUnavailable are terminal: a withdrawn credential must not get a second chance at the old door, and an unreachable daemon must not silently degrade into the legacy plane. Grants ride on the principal and are checked where the action is known, never in the middleware, which runs upstream of the router: spec:propose in service.Propose, below both write surfaces, and spec:read in each read surface's gate. /mcp checks per tool rather than at its Gate, because one endpoint carries both kinds and a surface-wide read grant would refuse a propose-only token at initialize. Principal.Authorize is a no-op off the instance plane, which is what keeps the local token working. The instance plane brings an owner where the local token had none, so a working token belonging to anybody but [sr.ht] owner-name is refused rather than admitted as a second identity: Principal.Owner is read by the provenance committer, the refs rule's principal kind and the coreauth AuthContext, all written for one human. StatusFor is the one status table. ErrUnavailable is 503 and never 401 — reading "I could not ask tokens.sr.ht" as "revoked" would refuse every live instance token while a daemon that is deliberately off the hot path restarts. An instance with no [tokens.sr.ht] section builds no instance plane and starts anyway, serving its own agent token as before.
refactor(authn): one Principal.CanRead() for the read-plane ACL (spec-ejq.1) graph's gate, web's mayRead and mcpsrv's Gate each hand-spelled 'IsOwner() || IsAgent()' — three copies of the read ACL, which graph's own comment warned is how a corpus leaks when they drift. Define it once as authn.Principal.CanRead and route all three through it. coreauth.Derive keeps its own owner||agent test on purpose: it answers a different question (is this an owner-backed identity to bridge to AUTH_INTERNAL), and coupling it to the read ACL would misroute a future read-only viewer kind to the owner's UserID. Closes spec-ejq.1
feat(webhooks): fire on proposal open/merge/reject (Phase 5a) The firing half — proposal lifecycle events now deliver GraphQL-native webhooks. Verified end to end against a live daemon: an agent REST propose delivers a signed POST whose body is the subscription's stored query executed against the ProposalEvent payload. - service: an EventSink seam (service/events.go). Propose emits PROPOSAL_OPENED for a new proposal, mergeProposal emits PROPOSAL_MERGED (the single merge point — both auto-merge and the human approve reach it), Reject emits PROPOSAL_REJECTED. Nil-safe; a Service with no sink emits nothing. - graph.NewProposalEvent builds the *model.ProposalEvent payload from a service.Proposal (reusing the existing service→graph→model mapping). - cmd webhookEventSink: proposal events happen in the service layer, which has none of core-go's request context, so the sink enqueues a dowork task onto the webhook queue. The task runs in the queue's worker context (server+database+config, from WithQueues), adds the owner's INTERNAL auth, and calls Schedule — which renders each subscriber's query and delivers it Ed25519-signed. Fire-and-forget off the write path: a webhook never blocks or fails a proposal write. Phase 5a (webhooks) is complete: DB, the authn→AuthContext bridge, the GraphQL surface, the core-go server wiring, and firing.
feat(cmd,graph): wire /query onto core-go's server for webhooks (Phase 5a) The faithful runtime wiring. /query moves from spec's anon-router handler onto core-go's authenticated router, so the webhook engine gets the auth/database/server context it requires. - cmd: build the executable schema via graph.NewSchema and hand it to both webhooks.NewQueue and server.WithSchema (one schema, both). The server is coreserver.New().WithDefaultMiddleware() (core-go auth + database + server context + the delivery worker via WithQueues). web, MCP and REST stay on the anon router with spec's own authn — only /query changes. The owner "user" row is seeded at startup so core-go's LookupUser stays local. - ownerOnly middleware on /query: 403s any non-owner (core-go auth admits any meta user; spec is single-owner) and remaps the owner to AUTH_INTERNAL so the webhook engine's NewAuthConfig/FilterWebhooks (which refuse AUTH_COOKIE) accept them. - graph: NewSchema exposes the raw executable schema; the webhook resolver ACL now requires AUTH_INTERNAL (only the owner gets it, via ownerOnly) instead of spec's authn, which is no longer in the /query chain. Accepted trade-off: agents lose GraphQL /query reads (they keep MCP + REST). New deploy requirement: WithDefaultMiddleware needs [mail] smtp-from (core-go's notification queue). Verified against a live daemon on Postgres: owner cookie creates and lists webhooks (row stored INTERNAL/user_id 1); non-owner 403; unauth 401; web UI 200 on the anon router.
feat(graph): GraphQL-native webhook surface (Phase 5a) The webhook types, mutations, and resolvers, adapted from the pages.sr.ht core-go template for spec's single-owner model. - SDL: WebhookEvent (PROPOSAL_OPENED/MERGED/REJECTED), WebhookSubscription interface + UserWebhookSubscription, WebhookDelivery, WebhookPayload interface + ProposalEvent (carries a Proposal), cursor wrappers, `webhook` payload root field, and a `type Mutation` with createUserWebhook / deleteUserWebhook. No OAuth `client` field and no @access/@private directives — spec has no OAuth clients or scopes, so the owner gate is the entire ACL. - Models: hand-written database.Model impls (UserWebhookSubscription, WebhookDelivery) so gqlgen autobinds rather than generates them; events via pq.Array; cursor keyset pagination. - Resolvers: all owner-gated via authn (spec's ACL), using core-go's webhook engine — Validate, NewAuthConfig (INTERNAL, via the coreauth bridge), FilterWebhooks, WebhookContext.Exec for the sample, and the `webhook`→Payload(ctx) root. Proposal writes deliberately stay off this surface (only webhook mutations; the schema test now asserts exactly that). - gqlgen.yml binds Cursor to core-go's model.Cursor; generated code regenerated with the pinned gqlgen v0.17.36 (reproducible). Compiles and vets clean; existing graph read tests still pass. Runtime context wiring and event firing are the next slices.
feat(graph): wire the proposals read to service.ListProposals (Phase 3) The Proposals port declared a proposal listing and left Options.Proposals nil, so the `proposals` query failed loudly with "service/ exposes no proposal listing yet". Phase 3 supplies it: an adapter maps service.Proposal onto graph.Proposal at the edge — the two structs are identical, but service/ must not import graph/, so the rename lives here beside web.NewReader's equivalent — and cmd wires graph.NewProposals(svc) into the schema. The `proposals` field now answers from service/.
feat(graph): the read-only GraphQL schema at /query Eight query fields over the service layer, no Mutation and no Subscription — the design defers mutations until the proposal state machine settles, and TestSchemaHasNoMutations stands guard on that. Access is fail-closed and gated before parse, matching web's ACL exactly, so introspection is treated as content too. A federating api.sr.ht must therefore present a token or skip us, which costs one log line. A malformed rev is reported as a GraphQL error rather than folded into null. service/ deliberately hides malformed-versus-absent from probing, but the caller here is already authenticated as the owner or its own agent, and a bare null for rev=proposals/42 is indistinguishable from an absent document — it reads as a silently dropped argument. Proposal listing declares its port but is unwired: service/ exposes no proposal read yet, and returning an empty list would tell a reviewer their queue is clear when it is merely unread.